BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Law Tech Consultants - ECPv6.15.15//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Law Tech Consultants
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://law-tech.net
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Law Tech Consultants
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20230312T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20231105T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20240310T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20241103T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20250309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20251102T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240305T080000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240307T170000
DTSTAMP:20260404T104021
CREATED:20240209T003720Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240212T211133Z
UID:10000007-1709625600-1709830800@law-tech.net
SUMMARY:Interview & Interrogation Plus Forensic Statement Analysis March 5\, 6\, 7\, 2024
DESCRIPTION:FREE TUITION– Contact BL Smith to register (blsmith@sandy.utah.gov) \nCourse Description \nThe focus of this advanced training is to familiarize the new or seasoned police officer and all investigators\, with the various disciplines of “detecting deception”. This is accomplished through learning to read non-verbal body language\, neurolinguistics\, and applying a cutting edge technique to analyze verbal and written statements. \n  \n\n\n\nForensic Statement Analysis (FSA) is a scientific\, investigative tool used to analyze written and/or oral statements taken from a person of “interest”\, whether a suspect\, victim\, complainant\, or a witness since the ultimate goal is to identify the truth. FSA eliminates or minimizes biases and prejudices and systematically determines the use and omissions of specific words\, phrases\, content\, grammar and other identifiers to determine a truthful\, balanced statement. A person’s own words will ultimately and unwittingly betray them as they provide indicators of deception through hidden clues of: “omissions”\, “improper changes in language”\, “lack of commitment” as well as identifying close and distant relationships to other person’s\, objects and events. These and many other indicators are made obvious and readily identifiable to the trained individual. In advanced applications\, statements can also be converted into numbers whereby they are subjected to a mathematical formula. Attendees will perform verbal analysis on videotaped oral interviews to practice and demonstrate the effectiveness of FSA. To further reinforce their proficiencies and understanding of these concepts attendees are assigned individual homework which will be reviewed on the following class day. \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 
URL:https://law-tech.net/event/interview-interrogation-plus-forensic-statement-analysis-march-5-6-7-2024/
LOCATION:MCTFT – Sandy Police Department\, 10000 Centennial Pkwy #111\, Sandy\, UT\, 84070\, United States
ORGANIZER;CN="BL Smith":MAILTO:blsmith@sandy.utah.gov
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240213T080000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240215T170000
DTSTAMP:20260404T104021
CREATED:20240116T190920Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240210T001017Z
UID:10000006-1707811200-1708016400@law-tech.net
SUMMARY:Interview & Interrogation Plus Forensic Statement Analysis February 13\, 14\, 15\, 2024
DESCRIPTION:Course Description \nThe focus of this advanced training is to familiarize the new or seasoned police officer and all investigators\, with the various disciplines of “detecting deception”. This is accomplished through learning to read non-verbal body language\, neurolinguistics\, and applying a cutting edge technique to analyze verbal and written statements. \n  \n\n\n\nForensic Statement Analysis (FSA) is a scientific\, investigative tool used to analyze written and/or oral statements taken from a person of “interest”\, whether a suspect\, victim\, complainant\, or a witness since the ultimate goal is to identify the truth. FSA eliminates or minimizes biases and prejudices and systematically determines the use and omissions of specific words\, phrases\, content\, grammar and other identifiers to determine a truthful\, balanced statement. A person’s own words will ultimately and unwittingly betray them as they provide indicators of deception through hidden clues of: “omissions”\, “improper changes in language”\, “lack of commitment” as well as identifying close and distant relationships to other person’s\, objects and events. These and many other indicators are made obvious and readily identifiable to the trained individual. In advanced applications\, statements can also be converted into numbers whereby they are subjected to a mathematical formula. Attendees will perform verbal analysis on videotaped oral interviews to practice and demonstrate the effectiveness of FSA. To further reinforce their proficiencies and understanding of these concepts attendees are assigned individual homework which will be reviewed on the following class day. \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n 
URL:https://law-tech.net/event/interview-interrogation-plus-forensic-statement-analysis-february-13-14-15-2024/
LOCATION:MCTFT U.S. Army – Criminal Investigation Division\, Cavazos\, TX\, United States
ORGANIZER;CN="U.S. Army":MAILTO:ctfoleadership@army.mil
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240130T080000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240201T170000
DTSTAMP:20260404T104021
CREATED:20240113T170626Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240116T192446Z
UID:10000005-1706601600-1706806800@law-tech.net
SUMMARY:Interview & Interrogation Plus Forensic Statement Analysis January 30\, 31\, February 1\, 2024
DESCRIPTION:Course Description:The focus of this advanced training is to familiarize the new or seasoned police officer and all investigators\, with the various disciplines of “detecting deception”. This is accomplished through learning to read non-verbal body language\, neurolinguistics\, and applying a cutting edge technique to analyze verbal and written statements. \n\n\n\nForensic Statement Analysis (FSA) is a scientific\, investigative tool used to analyze written and/or oral statements taken from a person of “interest”\, whether a suspect\, victim\, complainant\, or a witness since the ultimate goal is to identify the truth. FSA eliminates or minimizes biases and prejudices and systematically determines the use and omissions of specific words\, phrases\, content\, grammar and other identifiers to determine a truthful\, balanced statement. A person’s own words will ultimately and unwittingly betray them as they provide indicators of deception through hidden clues of: “omissions”\, “improper changes in language”\, “lack of commitment” as well as identifying close and distant relationships to other person’s\, objects and events. These and many other indicators are made obvious and readily identifiable to the trained individual. In advanced applications\, statements can also be converted into numbers whereby they are subjected to a mathematical formula. Attendees will perform verbal analysis on videotaped oral interviews to practice and demonstrate the effectiveness of FSA. To further reinforce their proficiencies and understanding of these concepts attendees are assigned individual homework which will be reviewed on the following class day. \n\n\n\nCourse Objectives: \n\n\n\n\nEasily AVOID the 10 most common mistakes\, such as misreading body language.\n\n\n\nDevelop strategies to conduct the interview\, which is different than the interrogation.\n\n\n\nUnderstand the “physiological responses” caused by the fight/flight and “freeze” syndrome.\n\n\n\nLearn to analyze verbal and written statements with amazing results.\n\n\n\nLearn how to tactfully ask the five “W” questions (who\, what\, where\, when\, why & how) and why to save closed ended questions for their one purpose.\n\n\n\nInstantly learn the secret of the one true lie.\n\n\n\nDiscover the sixteen categories of the evasive verbal responses (EVR’s) and easily counter them with the three strike rule.\n\n\n\nLearn to use the number one fear found in men vs. women to receive more information and confessions.\n\n\n\nFind instant success when you ask the three questions of the verbal lie detector.\n\n\n\nLearn these secret strategies that bring you more information\, confessions and possibly save your life.\n\n\n\nDescribe the process by which FSA identifies information from an individual’s internal dictionary and the advantages it offers to an interviewer over the traditional oral interview.\n\n\n\nAnalyze oral and/or written statements utilizing FSA and five colored highlighters and supporting their findings in a detailed written analysis or oral presentation to identify clues of truth and deception.\n\n\n\nLocate and present from a current or past publication (newspaper\, magazine\, court report\, etc.) an example of minimization used by a person of interest.\n\n\n\nList ten (10) “themes” or “nobler motives” of various crimes.\n\n\n\nIdentify the three (3) major motives (Treasure\, Pleasure\, Power).\n\n\n\nDiscuss the definition of a “lie” and how it relates to “Lies of Omission”.\n\n\n\nDemonstrate through a series of questions their ability to “obtain the pure version” by asking open-ended\, non leading questions.\n\n\n\nProvide an example (real or fictional) of a “change in language”\, “lies of omission”\, improper tense changes.\n\n\n\nList and describe at least six EVR’s and their significance in answering bipolar questions.\n\n\n\nDiscuss and recognize the difference between a “denial” and an “objection”.\n\n\n\nExplain and demonstrate the purpose and criteria of “three strike rule” and their ability to use it as a tool.\n\n\n\nPerform the memory technique exercise by performing a class exercise.\n\n\n\nDemonstrate their ability to recognize the correct responses to “control” questions and to choose the suspect based on that evaluation. (VIEW Quest.)\n\n\n\nDemonstrate their ability to prepare and utilize the “quid pro quo” theory in a classroom setting in front of an audience.\n\n\n\nList and describe the 3 E’s of success (earn the right\, excited to meet challenge and eager to empathize).\n\n\n\nList at least 3 advantages of a paper statement.\n\n\n\nList and explain the three questions of the verbal lie detector.\n\n\n\nExplain the idea and difficulties associated with lying (spider web).\n\n\n\nCompare and describe the advantages and disadvantages of a verbal vs. written statement.\n\n\n\nDescribe the purpose and difficulties of dealing with emotions in a statement.\n\n\n\nDiscuss the 4 sentences and how structure affects the meaning.\n\n\n\nList the three questions to ask of each word in a statement (why say it\, why say it here and why say it this way).\n\n\n\nDescribe the purpose of improper tense changes (First person\, singular\, past tense).\n\n\n\nList at least 3 Do’s and don’ts of FSA.\n\n\n\nExplain the “reflection of reality” and it’s association to identifying a personal relationship to another person (mannerisms\, courtesy\, social intro).\n\n\n\nDemonstrate their efficiency to balance a statement for the truth.\n\n\n\n\nTopics: \n\n\n\nStudents in this course will become familiar with: \n\n\n\n\nCommon myths of success or failure rate.\n\n\n\nLies of Omission.\n\n\n\nFight v. flight.\n\n\n\nTraditional problems.\n\n\n\nEvasive Verbal Responses.\n\n\n\nRecognizing that it is not easy to lie.\n\n\n\nOld v. new way of preparing for the interview.\n\n\n\nDirect questioning in every situation.\n\n\n\nIgnore the emotions\n\n\n\nLook for out of ordinary language.\n\n\n\nEvents in the past should be written as such.\n\n\n\nDo not accept conclusions from the subject.\n\n\n\nTruthful statements reflect reality.\n\n\n\nRecognize “links” suggesting missing time.\n\n\n\nRecognizing clues of deception in written statements.Balancing a written statement.\n\n\n\nStructured approach.\n\n\n\nMeans of communication.\n\n\n\n“Clusters” and “key” questions.\n\n\n\nVerbal evaluations.\n\n\n\nEstablishing power of influence.\n\n\n\nTruthful Characteristics.\n\n\n\nReinforcers.\n\n\n\nEscape hatches.\n\n\n\nDeceptive lies (generalized).\n\n\n\nBehavioral Exceptions.\n\n\n\nNormal eye contact.\n\n\n\nThe interrogation room.\n\n\n\nSteps to an interrogation.
URL:https://law-tech.net/event/interview-interrogation-plus-forensic-statement-analysis-2/
LOCATION:Wells Police Department\, 1563 Post Rd\, Wells\, Maine\, 04090\, United States
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR